Pre-exposure prophylaxis study for Cambodia

Australian researchers have teamed up with the US and Cambodia to conduct a study of the potential of the HIV antiviral tenofovir, taken daily, to prevent HIV infection in women at high risk.

Female sex workers, who in Cambodia currently stand up to a 26 percent chance of becoming HIV-infected within their first year working in the sex industry, will be invited to participate in a ground-breaking study which researchers acknowledge is challenging, but necessary.

The research partners, supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the University of San Francisco, and including Australia’s National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, will be looking at whether the use of antiretroviral therapy can prevent HIV-negative people from becoming infected, by fighting the replication of virus as it first enter’s the body’s cells.

It is a potentially risky approach: tenofovir, like all HIV antivirals, has a range of potential short and long-term side effects, ranging from allergic reactions and gastrointestinal disturbances to more serious, though rare, long-term effects like kidney damage. The long-term effects of any antiretroviral therapy in HIV-negative populations are not known and have never been tested.

Researchers have accepted the challenge in the hope that this approach — called ‘pre-exposure prophylaxis’ or PREP — may yield a viable prevention strategy for those at risk of HIV infection. Vaccine research is seen to be increasingly flagging in terms of new and viable approaches — especially after the recent failure of Thai trials of AIDSVAX, the only candidate HIV vaccine to have so far reached large Phase III studies. AIDSVAX has now been conclusively shown to have no effect in preventing HIV infection.

No studies have ever looked at whether current antivirals can prevent people from becoming infected with HIV. This study will look at up to 950 women currently at high risk.

Like vaccine studies, devising scientifically robust but ethically acceptable research in this area is extremely complex. Researchers and participants must weigh up the relative risks of HIV infection and drug side effects, as well as the imperative to find new ways to prevent HIV infection, in a world where more than 5 million people are believed to have acquired HIV in 2003 alone.

This issue looks set to become a major new area of debate in HIV/AIDS advocacy, as researchers in the US begin to weigh up PREP’s potential for preventing HIV infection in other high-risk groups, possibly including some gay men.

Text size: A A A

From Positive Living

This article was first published in December 2003 - more than four years ago.

While the content of this article was checked for accuracy at the time of publication, NAPWA recommends checking to determine whether the information is the most up-to-date available, especially when making decisions which may affect your health.

More stories from this issue.

This article contains medical information. NAPWA makes every reasonable effort to ensure the information on this website is accurate, reliable and up-to-date, including obtaining technical reviews by medically-qualified reviewers, however the authors of information on this website are not qualified to give medical advice, except where explicitly stated.

The content of this website is intended to support, not replace, the relationship between people living with HIV/AIDS and their medical advisers, and is not intended as a substitute for medical advice.

Posted online: 15 December 2003.
Last updated: 1 June 2005.

More stories about: